Your fucking gospels are letting you down again, G-C.
You see, "john" states:
whereas, Luke says:
See this is easy for me. There was no fucking jesus and so there were no fucking merry men for him to lead. You of course now have to make excuses for the contradiction between your silly "scriptures." Perhaps these illiterate fisherman were in the Upper Middle Class and had houses all over Galilee? When it comes to apologetic bullshit nothing surprises me!
You see, "john" states:
Quote:Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.–John 1:44
whereas, Luke says:
Quote:He went down to Capernaum, a city in Galilee, and was teaching them on the sabbath. They were astounded at his teaching … After leaving the synagogue he entered Simon’s house.–Luke 4:31-32a, 38a
Quote:They went to Capernaum; and when the sabbath came, he entered the synagogue and taught. They were astounded at his teaching … As soon as they left the synagogue, they entered the house of Simon and Andrew, with James and John.–Mark 1: 21-22a, 29
See this is easy for me. There was no fucking jesus and so there were no fucking merry men for him to lead. You of course now have to make excuses for the contradiction between your silly "scriptures." Perhaps these illiterate fisherman were in the Upper Middle Class and had houses all over Galilee? When it comes to apologetic bullshit nothing surprises me!
