(August 13, 2017 at 10:51 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(August 13, 2017 at 12:53 am)Minimalist Wrote:
I like those contradiction websites. I like them, because most of try way too hard to make contradictions where there are not any (they seem to want to make a large impressive number, rather than a strong case).
You see, I grew up in city X, actually my home for 17 years was in the countryside, technically in a small township, but I refer to home, the place where I grew up as the nearest city anyone not familiar with the area might recognize. I then moved to city Y, where I went to college. This was home for a while. After that I was recruited by a company, and they moved me to another state, another city Z where this was home for a few years. Then wanting to move back closer to family I moved back, this time to a larger city about an hour's drive from where I grew up. I rented a duplex by myself, for a short time, my brother lived with me in this duplex, and a while later, I moved to a suburb of this city, and rented a house with some friends. From there I was hired where I am now. For a couple of months, I stayed at my parents home (although someone who mostly knew me, may have said they where going to my house when visiting; also note, that they had moved, and this is not the home where I grew up). I rented a house for a few years, and this was home for that time. Finally I bought the house, that I am living in now. I now have two places I refer to as home, near city X where I grew up (I may refer to the actual house, the nearby city, or the region and the larger city; which I had also lived in); and the house I eventually bought.
So this is easy for me I am by no means rich, yet I have had multiple homes throughout my life. And someone would not be incorrect to refer to the place I was staying at any given time as my house, if they where coming to visit (even if it where technically someone else's house). So I like those Bible contradiction websites; because they often rather than trying to make a strong case, try to make a large number of cases. For a thinking person it is easy to see, how they are not contradictory or all that difficult at all.
Yeah, see how a person has to subjectively interpret something because it's so fucking vague? Nobody could possibly come up with a subjective interpretation that's the polar opposite of yours, no sir. Go fuck yourself, jackass. You've already proven you don't understand how any of this works, repeatedly.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.