(August 13, 2017 at 8:29 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(August 13, 2017 at 7:11 pm)Minimalist Wrote: These are your fucking books, dummy. I don't consider them "inspired" or "inerrant" or "written by the fucking finger of god."
Ok.... so your peculiar reference to contradictions in these would seem to make less since as an atheist. Under any normal circumstance, as I argued before, I don't think there is any contradiction (unless you add an argument from silence which is unwarranted and unusual).
Do you think you place odd expectations here... some kind of reverse atheist fundamentalism?
How the goddamn fucking fuck is an argument from silence unwarranted or unusual? The fuck is wrong with you? Seriously!
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
