Forgeries in the NT

[Amarok]

Ok.... so your peculiar reference to contradictions in these would seem to make less since as an atheist.  Under any normal circumstance, as I argued before, I don't think there is any contradiction (unless you add an argument from silence which is unwarranted and unusual).

Do you think you place odd expectations here... some kind of reverse atheist fundamentalism?

How the goddamn fucking fuck is an argument from silence unwarranted or unusual? The fuck is wrong with you? Seriously!

Indeed an argument from silence can be totally valid as Peter Kirby points out

https://infidels.org/library/modern/pete...lence.html

Or

http://vridar.org/2010/11/03/the-argument-from-silence/

Or

http://vridar.org/2010/08/14/do-mythicis...sumptions/

Or

http://vridar.org/2012/05/11/10-earl-doh...f-silence/


Apologists and Anti Mythicists love dragging this tired chestnut out . However most of the time in error and it has not been used incorrectly .