(August 22, 2017 at 12:20 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: How 'bout answering the question I put to you, in bold and italicized? All you've done so far is yet more spinning for the strengths of testimony in the face of physical evidence to the contrary.
As I said, I think it is an odd position which I have only seen in this extreme view from atheist groups. So I wanted to look at the reasons for it and if it is justified. I wanted to discuss it. From the other thread, which I did not intend for debate, others seemed to want to discuss it, and criticized me for not discussing it there, even though I told them to make a thread. Now, it seems that most don't want to discuss it, and are questioning me for doing so.
Why is my reason important to you? Do you want me to just accept your claims without reasoning or evidence? Can I not be skeptical?
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
