RE: "Is it a phase?"
August 23, 2017 at 12:38 am
(This post was last modified: August 23, 2017 at 12:39 am by Astonished.)
(August 23, 2017 at 12:33 am)ScienceAf Wrote:(August 23, 2017 at 12:31 am)NickPercent Wrote: We may be thinking of trolls as different things, for example, when i think of troll, i think of someone who goes online and terrorizes people for their beliefs, like in the last season of south park
Lmao, he's acting like that one German? guy from south park who wanted to expose trolls but was really just an dumb asshole in the end
(August 23, 2017 at 12:32 am)Astonished Wrote: I don't get how you thought anyone on here was giving them crap about THAT? The whole deal was clearly about false equivocation and it was pointed out numerous times. Their pretending not to get how either ignorant or dishonest that is, is almost certainly trolling or inexcusable stupidity. That in and of itself has nothing to do with their religious beliefs (but their lack of knowledge of non-faith perspectives). Their trying to lump lack of belief in with faith is just moronic. It's like saying evolution is a religion; no one wants to hear that shit and when an attempt to correct that is so far over their heads it might as well be in orbit, well, troll or head case, right?
How did we lump lack of religon and faith? How did we say anything remotly like "Evoultion is religon"
Quote from your OP:
"My Athiesm, Agnosticism, Nihilism, Christianity...I have had 100 Percent belief in each and everyone of these religous views..."
Atheism. Is. Not. A. Religion. By absolute definition. This makes you sound ignorant or dishonest. It's a false equivocation that theists use all the fucking time so that when they are criticized for being moronic assholes, they can pretend that their detractors are 'just as bad because they do it too'. Yeah, no, that's not how it fucking works, kiddo.
Agnosticism is not implicitly a religion. One can be an agnostic theist (although that's a pretty stupid position to hold) or more commonly an agnostic atheist, but 'not knowing' in and of itself is not religious since it applies to lack of knowledge about ANYTHING.
Nihilism is not a religion. It's a lifestyle or worldview.
Is that breaking it down simply enough for you?
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.