(August 25, 2017 at 11:15 pm)Court Jester Wrote: He did uphold the law. Some liberal political figures just didn't like how he did it.
He quite literally did not uphold the law. If you call yourself a conservative, you should be happy when the courts reign in the power of elected officials. Is the Constitution not the law of the land? The (conservative, I might add) courts ruled unanimously that Arpaio violated the Constitution. He decided that his way was better than the law.
Are you so blind in your "Republican" identity that no matter what the cost, you'll side with someone who openly, brazenly, and proudly defies the rule of law solely because you agree with their politics?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
