RE: Trump Pardons Arpaio!
August 26, 2017 at 9:28 am
(This post was last modified: August 26, 2017 at 9:30 am by Court Jester.)
If he was breaking the law with what he was previously doing, he would have been charged for it. If not before being told to stop, then definitely after not listening to the courts the second time around. The only thing they could get him on was contempt of court.
All he did was do his job after a judge told him not to do that job that the law clearly supported.
What if you were in the same position and found in contempt of court for doing what the law said you could/should do? No charges of breaking a law. That was looked for and not found. Just told to stop when the law clearly stated that you didn't have to.
All he did was do his job after a judge told him not to do that job that the law clearly supported.
What if you were in the same position and found in contempt of court for doing what the law said you could/should do? No charges of breaking a law. That was looked for and not found. Just told to stop when the law clearly stated that you didn't have to.