(August 26, 2017 at 1:45 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(August 26, 2017 at 8:48 am)Court Jester Wrote: Contempt of court because a judge told him to stop enforcing a written law. Not that he was enforcing in improperly, or he should have enforced it differently, or a hold on the enforcement of the law because it was in the process of being changed. Those would have added different charges.
And I'm sure that there's no coincidence that the state department announced the contempt charge on the eve of early voting.
Why did the judge tell him not to uphold the law though? Perhaps there was a valid reason for it.
Because he was violating the constitution. You know what the "constitution" is, right. It's that thing that clowns like CJ trot out when it suits their purpose and then ignore at any other opportunity.
