(August 28, 2017 at 9:38 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(August 28, 2017 at 8:45 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Are you saying, RR, that you think witness testimony is on par with all other forms of evidence available to us? That DNA evidence is as much "testimony" as any other testimony? I just want to be sure I'm understanding you correctly here...
I think that it is going to depend on the particulars of the case, and what the each piece of evidence is presenting and how it connects with others. Either may overturn the other depending on the circumstances. And yes, any facts or information from DNA, for me, is going to come from testimony or be information passed to me from another.
Oh, so NOW you decide to take a position on it? And not even a definitive one at that from the sound of it (I'll give you a hint; that makes your defense of testimony look really weak). Might as well have given me the same answer as when I first asked you.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
