Testimony is Evidence

[Astonished]

So the author claims there true therefore there true? . And no the logic does not hold the same. Present real cases or shut the hell up.

That's all I'm sayin'. An assertion is not proof of another assertion, it's the thing that demands evidence to verify its own veracity. All forms of testimony should be suspect and subject to scrutiny if they're not of the most utterly mundane nature like how long I spent on the toilet this morning, and testimony that claims something that we understand to be physically impossible or entirely absurd, even more so. So not only is it insufficient to be considered proof in ordinary matters, to go above and beyond the ordinary is correspondingly ludicrous.