Apparently neither of these morons can comprehend that until a witness is examined his "testimony" is merely an opinion.
Even after cross-examination it is up to the jury to decide his/her credibility.
Somehow they cannot seem to grasp that we do not attach the same level of reverence to the nonsense written in their holy horseshit that they do.
Even after cross-examination it is up to the jury to decide his/her credibility.
Somehow they cannot seem to grasp that we do not attach the same level of reverence to the nonsense written in their holy horseshit that they do.