(September 2, 2017 at 10:44 pm)Kernel Sohcahtoa Wrote:(September 2, 2017 at 5:22 am)ignoramus Wrote: Too many variables to make that conclusion CL, at this early stage (for me).
If she's a stunner, why would she bother with him? She's either got a dude or knocked back 50 before him.
Maybe he looks like Herman the monster and nobody's told him and she's just being polite?
This is interesting. Some years back, there was a woman in my workplace who had competed in a Miss Italy competition and had performed quite well in it. Now, for some reason, she had a crush on me, despite the fact that I'm not a physically appealing man: logically speaking, if we were to pair her off with a gentleman based on looks, you'd expect her to be interested in a very handsome man; however, IMO and based on my observations, such thinking is shortsighted. Thus, IMO, it makes sense that there are many variables to account for when considering the phenomenon of romantic attraction.
1) No offence intended but I find it funny how you type like a cyborg who discovered humans last week. I just mean you type very consistantly in an unemotional way, and in an observational way towards humans.
2) I question your not being physically appealing, I just read in another thread you were describing a work out regime and it sounds fairly impressive to me. Also what's appealing is subjective. Generally speaking though some sort of physical fitness is appealing.
3) The bit I agree with is there are many variables to account for in romantic attraction.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
