RE: Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?
September 12, 2017 at 11:12 am
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2017 at 11:15 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(September 12, 2017 at 7:44 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: A lot of atheists say the cosmological arguments of Aquinas are fallacious but none have yet revealed any flaws in his impeccable logic.
Well if you can't see why his supposed 'impeccable logic' is a bunch of non-sequiturs then I'm hardly surprised. Your failure to spot non-sequiturs is why you're still a theist.
(September 12, 2017 at 7:44 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: But really the topic is essentially whether the claims of the Christian faith are categorically different than those of other faiths and it is pretty obvious that they are.
Actually the topic is not about whether the claims of the Christian faith are categorically different than those of other faiths. The topic is about whether the evidence in favor of the Christian faith is categorically different from those of other faiths.
The fact you can't tell the difference between mere claims and actual evidence... is yet another reason why you're still a theist.
You and Steve are both very terrible at telling the difference between such things. So it's pretty obvious that that's why you haven't lost your faith.
