RE: Is Accepting Christian Evidence Special Pleading?
September 15, 2017 at 3:19 pm
(This post was last modified: September 15, 2017 at 3:26 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(September 15, 2017 at 3:03 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(September 15, 2017 at 2:30 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You mean the one where I included Carl Sagan explaining how interaction with a being from another dimension would work? Which in turn vindicates the Audio recording?
You mean the one where you invoked Carl Sagan in support of your little theory about the Holy Spirit, but then admitted that he would not accept your supernatural claim based on the available evidence? Yeah, I remember. That's called, colloquially, talking out of both sides of your mouth.
No no, I said he wouldn't know what to call it, observing the data, he would undoubtedly recognize it as supernatural.
Quote:Supernatural - departing from what is usual or normal especially so as to appear to transcend the laws of nature
(September 15, 2017 at 3:04 pm)Harry Nevis Wrote:(September 15, 2017 at 2:30 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You mean the one where I included Carl Sagan explaining how interaction with a being from another dimension would work? Which in turn vindicates the Audio recording?
But you don't care about facts, LFC you never do...
https://atheistforums.org/thread-41513-p...pid1213780
Your bias is clear...
Vindicates? Don't use words you don't know the meaning of.
I used the word properly bud...