Enlightened rants...

[Kernel Sohcahtoa]

Humanity will always need a leader from God. When they realize they cannot choose that leader as taught in Quran "they have no choice in the matter", the leader will be come out in the open as he has been waiting for humanity to come to their senses.

---

I hate Sunnism with a passion because it argued by the Jibt (sorcery) and Taghut (oppressive idol) to assert Ulil-Amr (possessors of the Authority) are that whether they meant Kings or Scholars or governors, and uses circular reference to falsehood and ignores Quranic context of the verses before and after and other Surahs to who Ulil-Amr are which negates it from all those but who God has chosen, and their arguments negates the only authority Quran legitimizes out of the falsehood of the Jibt and Taghut. I hate it more than any ideology in the world because they have the Quran but ignore it and twist it. "therefore if you dispute in a thing refer it to God and the Messenger" was to emphasize the purpose of God telling us to obey Ulil-Amr saying you can now make sure to refer all disputes properly back to Quran and Sunna through Ahlulbayt (as) who will give us intructions to society on how to judge and make sure what they teach is from Quran and Sunnah which Shiites don't follow either now but refer to Taqleed which is forbidden in Quran and Sunnah, not as an excuse to replace their authority with that of Jibt and Taghut, not an excuse to ignore the verses before and what they state regarding authority leading up to it and not to ignore the verses after, and to ignore what the whole Quran has emphasized on. Every revelation taught to obey God's chosen ones, manifested in groups of the chosen families, and delegated his mastery and authority to proofs and reminders who were twelve after the founding Captain, and it always the same SHIT from Satan and his forces and they infiltrate and argue by the same lame falsehood, you expect this time around to be different as Quran has used most of its text to refute these false arguments, but they still are used.

God doesn't exist.  And even if a deity does show up and prove it's existence, it will be up to humanity to decide whether that entity would have any value as a leader.  Until the existence of a deity is proven without the need of human books or preachers or imams, it's only logical to assume that all religious "teachings" have only one purpose: to gain control over other humans.

 
From a strictly observational standpoint, religion seems to enable people, especially religious leaders,  to take advantage of basic human psychology: based on my observations and reading, human minds are wired to connect and to attribute causal, human-like agency to the reality that it perceives. Thus, IMO, any charismatic, clever individual can find unscrupulous ways to make people (especially those individuals who are overwhelmed with a need to believe in something greater than themselves) buy into his or her personal truths while insisting that those truths come from some greater human-like source.  Hence, out of curiosity, how many practitioners of religion have genuinely considered the following: ( 1) does religious truth actually come from some greater sentient source of causal agency, or (2) is it simply the personalized preconceptions/biases/starting points of a particular individual or group of individuals; is it some kind of combination of (1) and (2)?