(September 22, 2017 at 11:38 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Sometimes I think you guys see all that I see, know what I know, and reminded by what I am reminded of, but then just turn away from the path because it seems hard or scary.
Sometimes I think you guys understand and perceive, but then convince yourself you have reason to turn away from the truth, by merely responding with whatever words you choose to respond by.
So you accuse us of being cowards and liars and expect us to take you and your beliefs seriously? Not going to happen. You owe all of us an apology.
Quote:How can the instruction on how to be human be other than a human example? How can it be some algorithm we cannot live up to or something society makes us or something we just play around with to suit our purposes?
We are human. We don't need instructions to be what we already are.
What we live up to is a matter of what we want to live up to. Our purposes are every bit as valid as anyone else's purposes, and from the point of view of our own lives they are the most valid for us individually.
Quote:A good question is: "Why a human as the proof/ruler/representative of God".
No, that's a stupid question. First you have to demonstrate that a god exists, using actual physical evidence that points only to a god. Then you have to demonstrate that the god has delegated responsibility to the human. Start with part 1: Run out and get us actual physical evidence for a god. Until you have evidence that is up to our standards (not your standards, which are frightfully low from my POV), you cannot move to part 2.
Quote:A better question is how to recognize the proof.
That's an even more ludicrous question. As a strong agnostic I believe it to be literally impossible to determine with certainty whether something is an actual god. For all you know and for all you can know, the Quran could have been crafted by men, by demons, or by a particularly mischievous telepathic space alien from the Crab Nebula.
(September 22, 2017 at 1:19 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: 6-This is not a wall of text. This is a wall of insults.
Why not both?