Enlightened rants...

[Whateverist]

You're evil...and you're evil, and you're evil....errybodies evil!

You'll never guess what I just found under my chair!

---

Yes, but if the towheaded ram doesn't espy the majesty of the dawn, how then are we to conceptualise the disparity between true love and the ersatz love as betwixt the eternally separated offspring of the immortal unknowable infinite and eternity itself? One cannot possibly exist without sure and certain knowledge of the other, therefore they must both necessarily exist even at the expense of themselves. Consequently our mortal endeavours must ultimately fail to seek that which our souls yearn to find; the ultimate truth that subsists within all things that are truly consequential to the infinite mortality of every corporeal entity, thus giving verisimilitude to all logically contingent notions of serendipitous and iconoclastic profundity.

Now prove me wrong.

Well, first you are making inter-textual allusions to nonverbal semiotic structures without properly referencing the culture specific connotations operating within any given subjective linguistic structure thereby confusing them with arbitrary symbol system conventions. You also failed to note that discursive expressions are heavily laden with iconic novelties that cannot be deconstructed into universalizing conceptual categories.

Everyone knows that.

You have something against inter-textuals?  How very unenlightened.

---

Humanity will always need a leader from God.

---

When they realize they cannot choose that leader as taught in Quran "they have no choice in the matter", the leader will be come out in the open as he has been waiting for humanity to come to their senses.

---

I hate Sunnism with a passion because it argued by the Jibt (sorcery) and Taghut (oppressive idol) to assert Ulil-Amr (possessors of the Authority) are that whether they meant Kings or Scholars or governors, and uses circular reference to falsehood and ignores Quranic context of the verses before and after and other Surahs to who Ulil-Amr are which negates it from all those but who God has chosen, and their arguments negates the only authority Quran legitimizes out of the falsehood of the Jibt and Taghut. I hate it more than any ideology in the world because they have the Quran but ignore it and twist it. "therefore if you dispute in a thing refer it to God and the Messenger" was to emphasize the purpose of God telling us to obey Ulil-Amr saying you can now make sure to refer all disputes properly back to Quran and Sunna through Ahlulbayt (as) who will give us intructions to society on how to judge and make sure what they teach is from Quran and Sunnah which Shiites don't follow either now but refer to Taqleed which is forbidden in Quran and Sunnah, not as an excuse to replace their authority with that of Jibt and Taghut, not an excuse to ignore the verses before and what they state regarding authority leading up to it and not to ignore the verses after, and to ignore what the whole Quran has emphasized on. Every revelation taught to obey God's chosen ones, manifested in groups of the chosen families, and delegated his mastery and authority to proofs and reminders who were twelve after the founding Captain, and it always the same SHIT from Satan and his forces and they infiltrate and argue by the same lame falsehood, you expect this time around to be different as Quran has used most of its text to refute these false arguments, but they still are used.

---

Oh crap.  The meds .. take the meds!