(September 24, 2017 at 3:26 pm)BlindedWantsToSee Wrote:(September 23, 2017 at 7:39 pm)Astonished Wrote: You neglected to mention psychologically, and that's where the primary issue that you're causing to be suspect lies. This woo-crap you're spouting, religiously based or not, is evidence of a tremendously unhealthy mind. I was not exaggerating that my preadolescent self would think you were crazy or stupid based on what you're claiming here. Since you're claiming you're not religious (and I'll uncharacteristically take you at your word here) then I can't also assume that some form of indoctrination is what made you this way (although it's possible it did, and you escaped whatever form it took and just latched onto something else because of all the damage it did to your psyche) so whether you've just got some defect making you predisposed to believe in utter nonsense or you've been trained like a seal, it's very, very clear that something is not right upstairs.I do not seek to force my views onto anybody. I'm just extremely sure of what I am saying. What I tried to do is just share my interpretations of life (as a whole) with people, so they can see if that's something they consider useful; and if not now, maybe later. And if not ever, that's fine too.
Your denial of reality notwithstanding, it comes across as enormously condescending when you intransigently claim you've got the right answer and offer spurious 'reasons' for why that is so. You are pretty far behind on your apologies for this disrespect and seem to have only superficial remorse without actually understanding the nature of what you're saying that is so irritating and insulting.
You should really stop, demolish this whole inane hypothesis, go back to the beginning, and try to build it back up. When you realize you fail to do so, you'll be ready to sit at the adults' table. Until then, go stand in the corner while the seven-year-olds tell you you're too little to play with them.
(September 24, 2017 at 3:19 pm)Cyberman Wrote: Oh, and "uni-verse" is an inaccurate breakdown of the word and its etymology. It means "the whole thing ", not "one whole thing". Sloppy definitions lead to sloppy conclusions.
You may disagree, but I think most people will agree that "the whole thing" is singular. It is referring to one thing. In other words, to all individual things taken as one whole thing or system. This discussion is silly.
This surety of yours is unwarranted and has serious connotations of condescension. Your casting aspersions on us because we just don't 'see' what you're getting at and that's extremely insulting, even moreso when you fail to present evidence for your claims and expecting others, whether us or those you hope will read your bullshit book, to be stupid enough to buy into it. You're no different than those asshole televangelists who peddle their invisible products and aren't 'forcing' anything onto anyone but have no compunctions about fleecing the gullible. We see right through that shit around here. You're not going to make a buck off anyone with a functioning brain.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.