setting a watchman

[Drich]

Rand Paul talking does not a law make.

Rand Paul talking in that arena on that subject represents how a great number of people feel. if you guys could do an honest pole you would find yourself in the minority when it comes to ownership of children. Only people who seek to serve the state are willing to give up possession of thier children because they been taught to thing "progressively" and thus are willing to do so so easily as per your comment about simple mistreatment

actually that is not true. mistreatment is not the qualifier it habitual mistreatment with no means of correction, and at that point the state can only take tempoary custody of the children till the parents get their crap together.

Wrong. You can definitely 'mistreat' your child once and have him or her taken away forever.

maybe in the hitler state of callifornia or vermont or where ever burny is from, but in the real world where I have worked in homes where children were beyond mistreated, but because there was direction/hope for better treatment in the future the child remained. We have call I have called to have children removed, all it does it get you black listed from the community members. their life has to be in imminent danger and in said danger all the time before the state will move.

Understand this is my very point. I am showing you where we as people can OWN another person and it not be a chattle slave/roots type of relationship. If we can own our children and love them is it not possible in your mind to do this with another human being? especially if a man works along side of you as a brother? Again that is how 'uncle tom's" got their name. They were black slaves who were seen as family to white owners.

You don't fucking own your kids.

Actually my wife and i own our kids. why? because that state holds us responsible for their actions. If one of my monkeys takes my gun out of a lock safe and shoots someone he doesn't goto jail. I do till it gets sorted out. gaurdians are not responsible if the ward commits a crime.
https://www.americanbar.org/newsletter/p...ility.html

only if you close your mind and try and look at slavry in the typical black and white "slavery is bad m'kay, slavery is bad" world view. Because Again it is through our ownership of our children that we can show ownership of another human being is not an inherently evil. nor am I saying it is always good. Ownership of another is a morally netural experience. it is the circumstance in how one is obtained and treated that makes it a good or bad thing.

what of those 45 million who would currently die without slavery? that is like haveing another world war's wrth of people died in a few month you freaking moron. If we abolished all slavery because "slavery is bad M'kay Slavery is bad"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh7l8dx-h8M

Again mrs. mackie what happens to all of those who depend on slavery to live? 45million slaves then billions of outhers who depend on the food and raw material the slaves produce.. not 300 years ago, but today.

If slavery is all bad, and you remove it, what happens to those people what happens to us?

and if I don't? it doesn't mean I don't own them.

It definitely does. Try selling them and see what happens, dumbass.

never been through the adoption process have you?
all they do is just change the wording of exchanging of money, but the actions are the exact same.

Basically teen are the cheapest to buy, (can in most states get paid to take them) then 'ethnic children' then 'white children' then white babies. do you know how much it COST to BUY a White baby though legit adoption channels? about 25K My sister can't have kids so she bought a white 3year old who's mother had the little girl in immanent danger all the time. Brken legs arm ribs ect. after like the 10th time the state pulled the little girl my sister came in and started the adoption proceedures cost her about 15K. two years later the woman as a little boy, this time a boy/baby. they put up 20K in "medical and rehoming fees" but another family offer about 5K more so it went to court and the other family got the boy. So the court split a family for 5K dollars.

My sister and her husband are no slouches they own a marble/granite counter top shop. they live in a very very nice home/compound great people. the other side lived well but not so good. They were told later the money offer was the deciding factor, after being told their "donations were not being looked at."

So tell me some more that children (blonde hair blue eyed children) aren't bought and sold in this country and I can call you naive.

1600 pennsylvania washington dc 20003
send the cops there.

field trip

Slaves don't get contracts. What in the actual fuck are you talking about?

huh, yes they do... not all slaves are chattle (property) slaves are defined as There is a difference between chattle slavery and slavery. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery

Even if you want to play word games and will not take ownership of your children, I promise the vast majority of parents in this country will absolutely claim ownership of their kids.

Yeah, because there are weird fucking sickos in this country.

-or they simply reject the social conditioning of far left.

I can't believe that you actually believe all this stuff. It's not fathomable to me that a person be this much of a dimwit and still be able to type words in a semi-coherent fashion.

I can't believe you are willing to over look the 45 million slaves we have in the world now so you can take a political stance.

I can't pretend like you guys do that my life is not directly impacted by modern slavery. therefore i must acknoweledge it and reexamine it. I ask my self what the would would truly be like if it just disappeared one day and what the world is like now... We are far better off now, otherwise 45 million people just die because there is no infrastructure in place not just now but in the history of all of society that can support 45 million people without producing or making some sort of money/profit from little to no pay work. In essence these people are trading years of life for just that... that ability to survive/live. take away that support nothing we can do will replace it.

---

Even if you want to play word games and will not take ownership of your children, I promise the vast majority of parents in this country will absolutely claim ownership of their kids.

Logical fallacy:  Argument from popularity.

DUH!!!
because the premise being argued is determined by what the majority does.

I believe that any individual who claims ownership of any other individual is in the wrong.  No exceptions, ever.

who cares what one nut job believes??? who are you? Now surround yourself with 300 million other voices and then ad populium what you say matters, why? because the voice of the country supports what you have to say.