What the fuck difference does it make if emotions are subjective or objective? We've been experiencing them our entire lives, we understand how to change them, how to lose control of them by various means, how to manipulate them by other means, how to change them in an instant, and how the exact same situation can affect two people entirely differently on an emotional level (which would be considered subjective, at least in the underlying cause that triggers the emotional effect).
You should go check out the thread on objective morality. If you use the axiom of well-being, those things that promote and diminish well-being are objective but there is still a lot that has to be decided subjectively as far as what is worse or better in a given situation where consensus cannot be achieved. Maybe then whatever it is you're talking about here will make an ounce of sense or have some semblance of relevance.
You should go check out the thread on objective morality. If you use the axiom of well-being, those things that promote and diminish well-being are objective but there is still a lot that has to be decided subjectively as far as what is worse or better in a given situation where consensus cannot be achieved. Maybe then whatever it is you're talking about here will make an ounce of sense or have some semblance of relevance.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
