RE: What does the science data say about firearms?
October 6, 2017 at 10:31 am
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2017 at 10:38 am by Drich.)
(October 5, 2017 at 4:52 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(October 5, 2017 at 4:30 pm)Drich Wrote: If by sane you mean anti-constitutional ex-hippy nut job.... then I am happy with the title I have been given.
you mean like being forced to take class, and shooting test, then a safty test and register, then back ground check that you have to pay for wait 5 days or "just" steal one from a pissed off guy who had to do all of that stuff??
wait a tick... isn't that what we do now?
Yea it would SUCK if someone had given the Vegas killer a psych test.
It would suck if a psych test had prevented him from buying all those firearms.
Yes you fucking idiot. If you are going to own an object that when you pull the trigger the object it propels at 75Omph yes, I do think you should be SANE and know what the fuck you are doing.
There is no rewind on a bullet DUMBFUCK.
Your bullshit is like saying, "Why cant the Germans control their own destiny?"
It is a firearm, not a video game, not a squirt gun. There are no rewinds or resets or do overs once you pull the trigger. SO YEA, I do give a fuck whom is pulling the trigger.
The problem with "I wouldn't" is morons like you make it about you. It is not about what you would not do, it is about the real data outside of you.
Your continued responses do not lend me the confidence to think you should own a firearm. "I can do what I want" is not a rights issue with firearms, the reality is, if you don't know what the fuck you are doing, and you ASSUME you get lazy, and that can get you killed.
You may make it about rights, but the firearm you use doesn't give one fuck about any mistake you make nor is a a human lawyer. It is an object, it still requires reason to use and it is not as simple as "just because."
I'd trust Mimoony89 before I would trust you.
WFT are you on about?
I simply stated the ideas you purposed have already been implemented made into law, and you don't seem to know it. Mental health is indeed a qualification and one's back ground check does delve into mental health, as well as spousal abuse, drug use, pot specifically/but asks about all drugs.
You don't seem to know what laws exist, what's more scary is that because they do they did nothing to slow this guy down which makes your proposals all meaningless and us right. In that evil people will do evil thing regardless of the law.
(October 5, 2017 at 9:27 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Of course things fail to operate perfectly. That doesn't mean we don't use them. Cars break down, boats spring leaks ... but just because smart-gun technology doesn't work perfectly, it should not be implemented at all?
That's some stupid reaso -- oh, wait, it's from Drich. Never mind.
I am not stopping anyone from buying and using a 'smart gun.' Not saying they should or should not own one. I simply am making a point that it should not be a governmental mandate to own one.
