(October 13, 2017 at 9:05 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I've always felt this has to be one of those dilemmas that ruins theists' sleep:
-If the first clause is true, then that means morality exists independent of God, and God isn't needed for Man to be a moral actor.
-If the second clause is true, then one must accept rape, enslavement, murder, torture, infanticide, and genital mutilation as morally good.
Boru
If the first clause is true, then that means morality exists independent of God, and God isn't needed for Man to be a moral actor.
God creates morals just by giving humans the survival instinct .
If the second clause is true, then one must accept rape, enslavement, murder, torture, infanticide, and genital mutilation as morally good.
Well God says what is good and automaticaly evil is created as the oposite . But God didn't tell you to be evil.