(October 16, 2017 at 10:44 am)Huggy74 Wrote: So read the quote I was responding to...
Why you commenting on something you don't know the proper context of?
Ah yes the taken out of context excuse. So let's include all the context and see if your question and justification makes any more sense ...
(September 13, 2017 at 5:52 am)chimp3 Wrote:(September 13, 2017 at 5:50 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: If religion and science are 1000% opposite, does that negate the very real scientific advancements made by religionists?
Boru
Were they using prayer or the scientific method to make their findings?
(September 13, 2017 at 6:09 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Does it matter?
(October 15, 2017 at 7:24 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(September 13, 2017 at 10:13 am)Khemikal Wrote: I suspect that it does. Praying for something to fly isn't as effective as working out the principles of lift.
How did nature manage to work out the principles of lift without science?
(October 16, 2017 at 10:37 am)Huggy74 Wrote: That statement was obviously sarcasm, since I believe in a creator and not that nature actually figured out the principles of lift.
The point was flight has been around a long time, and neither prayer or science had anything to do with it.
Nope. Sorry. Still a stupid question, albeit one followed up by a feeble and contrived excuse that doesn't make sense.
The word here is Busted.