(October 19, 2017 at 8:06 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(October 18, 2017 at 11:32 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: So, no answer for the dilemma then, huh? I didn't think so.
Not having an answer that you would accept is not the same as having no answer.
(October 19, 2017 at 1:28 am)Whateverist Wrote: ... but NO THEIST is capable of rationally challenging atheism.
How can anyone challenge a belief that doesn't exist? That in itself would be irrational, wouldn't it? (My guess is that just went over your head...)
Oops, you want to address that to Hammy, Neo.
(October 18, 2017 at 8:10 pm)Hammy Wrote:(October 18, 2017 at 6:40 pm)Whateverist Wrote: Naw, the circle is bigger than that. Purplundy, Fr0d0 and Jacob Smooth come to mind and there have been a couple others besides these and the two you mention, but damned if I'm going to remember.
Yes the circle is perhaps wider than Kingpin and CL when it comes to worthy contributions to AF.... If we're talking OFF-TOPIC STUFF but NO THEIST is capable of rationally challenging atheism. Because there is no rational defense for an imaginary friend. So let's stop humoring them.
We disagree and it isn't because I think the stupid shit that fundies believe is worth discussing. It is because I'm interested to hear why intelligent people who disagree with me think what they do. Just because so many fundies are idiots doesn't mean everyone who disagrees with us is an idiot.
