(October 28, 2017 at 4:59 pm)kakarot123 Wrote:(October 28, 2017 at 4:54 pm)Lutrinae Wrote: Tell him that he hasn't proven anything through his word salad. Unless he can provide hard, empirical, evidence for god's existence, he is merely relying upon his personal, fallible experience of religious faith that is merely a belief not based on proof.But how can i argue with his logic when he says that our discussion has no meaning if God dosent exist because God is eternal life and truth..the one thing that we need to achive??
Just reply to him using his words except for inserting "slood" in the place of "god". What he is telling you is meaningless, because all he is doing is asserting something as fact without even bothering to show how it is fact.
And if he is still stupid enough to continue with that line of nonsense, your next response is to ask him to show how what he says is true. He'll either get himself tied up in knots or he'll go away knowing he's lost.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home