Theism is literally childish

[Kernel Sohcahtoa]

I gave her kudos because I found the op interesting and thought that it was well formatted and presented in a coherent, concise manner.  However, I do not share the opinion of the thread title, as IMO, it inhibits genuine opportunities for mutual learning and dialog between the secular and non-secular camps.  With that said, you, along with Neo, Catholic Lady, alpha male, roadrunner, and ignorant, have posted some interesting/well-formatted ideas on these boards, which I have found to be neat and kudos as a result.  Hence, for me at least, a cool/interesting idea is cool/interesting regardless of whether the person presenting it is secular, non-secular, or whatever.

I disagree with you that matildas claims and assertions about theists were cool or interestong lol, but i appreciate this post from you. A lot of the stuff she said wasn't even true. like that teaching a child about faith discourages thoughtfulness, takes away personal responsibility, makes you stop maturing mentally, etc. I'm not disputing that in some cases it does, depending on how it's done, but that certainly wasn't the case for me and many many others. I was taught that doubt is good because it makes you seek answers and may lead to a deepening of your faith. I was taught that it's important to understand why we believe certain acts are immoral, and there's not a single moral teaching that I blindly follow without understanding. I'd also say I'm not an immature person, but that's just my opinion I guess lol.

My usage of "cool and interesting" was meant to describe the posts made by you, RR, Neo, AM, and other theists whom I have given kudos, not the op; I don't think the op is cool because it inhibits mutual learning and dialog. As I stated in the beginning of my previous post, I gave kudos to the op because I thought it was interesting, well formatted, and presented in a coherent/concise manner.