(November 11, 2017 at 5:28 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(November 11, 2017 at 5:14 pm)datc Wrote: Wtf? My OP presents precisely evidence or proofs. Whether they overwhelm you or not is for you to decide. But you refuse so much as to look at them (apparently because it's much easier not to think at all).
The two aren't synonyms...and without evidence, "proofs" are just an exercise in grammar and syntax.
I'm familiar with Aquinas. I don't find his arguments compelling, not even as an exercise in grammar and syntax. You could pick one, post it - or your summary. Maybe what/why you think it's compelling, and I could tell you why I don't.
We wouldn't agree, but at least we'd understand each other better. I'd know why you believed, and you'd know why I don't.
But my argument is different from Aquinas'. It is both more extensive and more precise.
That's why in the 3rd paragraph I write, "Here is where he and I part ways."