Trophy Hunting Good?!

[Amarok]

It not just an opinion it's based on time after time debating him on those very subjects .

You cannot assert that this argument is faulty because past arguments were faulty. That's a blatant logical fallacy. 

Address the argument being made, not the person presenting it or their history in other, non-related arguments.

But that's not what i was doing . I was pointing out that like all those other topics benny expresses the same faults. Second the person is relevant if just as with those the arguments fit the same pattern of faults which is what i was pointing out .

---

I didn't say they weren't different

Who are you addressing me or him ? I never said that you said their was no  difference.