RE: "Republicunt": why use terms like this?
November 20, 2017 at 8:12 pm
(This post was last modified: November 20, 2017 at 8:18 pm by Joods.)
(November 20, 2017 at 2:15 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(November 20, 2017 at 1:29 pm)Hammy Wrote: That is bigoted. It's extremely anti equal rights.
In your opinion.
It is also the courts opinion as well, otherwise they wouldn't have had same sex marriage legalized, you dolt. Clearly, you prove to anyone reading your drivel that you are the bigoted one here.
(November 20, 2017 at 6:04 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(November 20, 2017 at 5:17 pm)Grandizer Wrote: Except that my wish for my value system to be reflected in civil law does not extend misery to those oppressed and continue to deprive them of their rights.
Just because some people with specific sexual proclivities don't want to enter the only kind of on-going commitment that includes the potential to produce offspring,...that personal reluctance doesn't mean they're being denied any specific right.
You do understand that "specific sexual proclivities" isn't what equal rights is about, don't you?
In case you don't, let me educate you. Equal rights are about a married, same sex couple being entitled to the same marriage rights that traditional married couples enjoy such as the right to property if a spouse should die. Or adoption rights or health care rights etc. Once you understand that, how about removing your bigoted, rose colored glasses and learn how to love as your god commanded, not hate as you see fit to do.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.