RE: Potentially Big News On The Human Evolution Front
November 20, 2017 at 9:17 pm
(This post was last modified: November 20, 2017 at 9:18 pm by GrandizerII.)
(November 20, 2017 at 5:45 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(November 20, 2017 at 5:34 pm)Grandizer Wrote: And 0 proof of God.
Yes, I mentioned there is no proof of God. There is no proof of either route you take, that was my point.
Quote:But we know the cosmos exists, so for now, it's more reasonable to believe the cosmos has always been. No need for God.
By "cosmos", you mean the universe, right?
If so, then I disagree completely and think it's actually quite the opposite of what you've bolded. Because as I said earlier, there's been 0 evidence that anything in this universe could always have existed. Only evidence to the contrary - that the physical laws of our universe calls for things to have an origin.
We already know the big bang caused the cosmos, so we know they haven't always been here.
By cosmos, I mean everything in existence aside from the supernatural. This includes the universe that we observe but also other stuff that may be in existence.
Anyway, extend your reasoning to the idea of God. If we have no evidence that anything has always been, and that we have evidence for things regularly having an origin, then you cant argue that some grand like God can be exempt from the rule while not granting the same to the whole of the cosmos, which is also a grand entity.
Furthermore, if there is no cosmos, then what would logically be in its place? It makes more sense that the cosmos has always been than that some entity that is totally "nothing" existed at one point despite being nothing at all.
