RE: I know I'm not supposed to revive really old threads, so...
November 21, 2017 at 11:57 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2017 at 12:03 am by Succubus.)
(November 21, 2017 at 10:29 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(November 21, 2017 at 8:29 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Probably the best option is to start a new thread and reference the original with a link as you did here.
Personally, I don't have a problem with reviving the original thread, considering what it is, but best to keep to the rules.
Wouldn't the thread in question be eligible for an exception under the necroposting rule?
Why do have an problem with other peoples sexual preferences?
(November 21, 2017 at 10:47 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote:(November 21, 2017 at 10:29 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: Wouldn't the thread in question be eligible for an exception under the necroposting rule?
Also a good question, which is part of the reason I don't see a problem with resurrecting the thread.
MH: You're about to become an interesting side note in the history of medical experimentation!
You're another one I see!
(November 21, 2017 at 11:01 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote:(November 21, 2017 at 10:58 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: If you're involved, side note only means that you're underestimating yourself.
Now take out your Swiss Army knife.........
*Blunt spoon*
Well if that what turns them on, who are we to judge?
Just saying.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
