(November 24, 2017 at 8:49 am)DLJ Wrote:(November 24, 2017 at 8:37 am)pocaracas Wrote: You assume those will peacefully just walk out? or purging means elimination?
If a system is good, then it's applied almost everywhere... where would those "Autonomy-ethics" people go?
That seems to me to be unfeasible without ending up in a dictatorship... so... no, thank you!
They do peacefully walk out.
As they say ... "if you can't change the people, change the people."
It happened just this week. We had a conversation about ethics and she agreed that she wasn't psychologically ready (fit for purpose / use).
The Autonomy-ethics people can go to where they have a "my freedoms are more important than your freedoms" state-of-mind e.g. USA.
It is a dictatorship when it needs to be e.g. Disaster Recovery scenarios. But it's also multiple overlapping dictatorships as per recognised areas of expertise.
Communism is about policies/procedures/framework and culture/ethics/behaviour not organisational structure.
Ok, there's no way you're being serious
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
