I see a real world problem in scenario 2.
"If one of you testifies against the other, the one who testifies gets to walk (0 years in prison). However, the one convicted will get 3 years in prison."
Is it not likely the three year guy will now change his testimony and now both of them are heading for the nick? Or is this angle not part of the dilemma.
"If one of you testifies against the other, the one who testifies gets to walk (0 years in prison). However, the one convicted will get 3 years in prison."
Is it not likely the three year guy will now change his testimony and now both of them are heading for the nick? Or is this angle not part of the dilemma.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.