RE: Van Tillian/Clarkian Presuppositional Apologetics.
August 19, 2011 at 4:54 pm
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2011 at 4:55 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(August 19, 2011 at 4:37 pm)Rhythm Wrote: He's making a buddhist argument Stat, they have morality too. A christian whining about plagiarism is fucking rich.
However Buddhism cannot provide justification for the uniformity in nature and reliability of one's senses, so in a Buddhist world knowledge would not be possible either. So it can't be that one, check it off the list
(August 19, 2011 at 4:52 pm)Rhythm Wrote: And the evidence of the impossibility of the contrary is based on what? Oh, that's right, presupposistion of the impossibility of the contrary.
No, it's the fact that you cannot give a reason for the way you live given your worldview, which violates the principle of sufficient reason.
