A God?

[Edwardo Piet]

I'm happy to swap reasoning for NE Evidence if you are EvF

How can you say there's equally no reasoning for FSM and x-God? On one hand you have a clever joke to smite some ignorant school, on the other thousands of years of accumulated rock solid statments. Hardly similar,apart from the lack of physical/ scientific proof.

See, all I think you're really talking about is scientific proof, and not reasoning at all.

(damn - I need sleeep! lol)

There is ZERO evidence of ANY God that I know of (NE included) and ZERO of the FSM. What's the difference?

And I will GLADLY swap 'reasoning' for NE evidence too.

I have just realized too, that 'NE evidence' works oddly well. Because NE could also mean ANY (because it's pronounced the same, the letters 'N' and 'E' 'N-E') as well as non-empirical. So NE could also stand for any as in any form of evidence whether emprical OR non-empirical.

So NE seems to work really well. I will happily swap it fr0dest0r

EvF