A God?

[Edwardo Piet]

Oh. I thought we agreed to swap 'reasons' or 'reasoning' for specifically NE evidence.

Because as I have said, these 'reasons' of yours, if they actually are a valid reason to believe that God actually EXISTS then they WOULD count as evidence of SOME form; although it would very probably have to be non-empirical (NE) because "God" is outside of the 'empirical realm'.

So since we are cutting emprical evidence out of the picture; and if these 'reasons' are actually valid in the sense that they are valid reasons to believe God actually EXISTS then they would have to count as NE evidence then (assuming we're cutting out emprical[/i].

So we're still dealing with (NE) evidence. As I have explained above, if your 'reasons' or 'reasoning' actually addresses the question and gives valid reasons to believe that God actually exists - then it would be evidence of SOME FORM.

SO - I ask for NE evidence.

I thought that what you were suggesting is the swapping of 'reasoning' and 'reasons' for specifically NE (NON-Empirical!) Evidence.

I must have either read it backwards or you phrased it backwards I think. I got the swap wrong? Lol.

EvF