Evenin' all

[Jollocks]

Well, I would argue that a belief by definition doesn't require proof, and whether proof is needed and perhaps parameters set for what constitutes "proof" or "evidence", can be arbitrary when arguing over something which in itself is subjective, means the concept of proving existence of hell becomes quite pointless. After all, I can only measure in investigate the natural phenomena which I can observe. Outside of that, there doesn't seem to be much point in even seeking objective evidence in either way (after all, I couldn't prove non-existence, either).
At any rate, something like that, although most likely vastly different from the commonly accepted Christian-centric view of hell.

---

Newbie here. No, I'm not an atheist, I'm an orthodox Jew. However, I'm also (which is what brought me to this site) a scientist. I don't have anything particularly against atheists, except maybe the more 'militant types', but I do often find it strange that a growing number of atheists claim to place their "faith" in rationality and science, and then display an ignorance of scientific facts and method, or knowledge of common myths. I'm sure many atheists here familiar with the life sciences also cringe when they hear someone vehemently arguing that humans evolved from apes, rather than from a common ancestor!
So mainly, I'm just here to help out, given my passion for the sciences.

Nice to be aboard.

Welcome. do not forget to change your password.

I am the gang leader of a zionist conspiracy againt them nazis.And I am an atheist. Your god is a fantasy

A Zionist eh? I fear we may lock horns on political discussions at some point.
Mind if I ask what type of Zionist?