RE: Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic
March 9, 2018 at 9:08 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2018 at 9:11 am by Huggy Bear.)
(March 9, 2018 at 8:53 am)Grandizer Wrote: If there's no explanation, then there's no explanation. Full stop. It's a logical contradiction to say there's no explanation, while simultaneously declaring the supernatural as an explanation.
Supernatural basically means unexplained scientifically... I love how you guys always try to argue semantics.
(March 9, 2018 at 8:53 am)Grandizer Wrote: But we do have an explanation anyway (Min did a great job of providing it). You just don't want the explanation to be true for understandable psychological reasons.Yes Min did an excellent job of providing a photo taken inside the Sam Houston coliseum 20 years after the fact and another photo taken at the Ed Sullivan show, which is totally unrelated.
(March 9, 2018 at 9:02 am)Grandizer Wrote:(March 9, 2018 at 8:59 am)Huggy74 Wrote: The issue is not the light, it's the behavior of the light.
Rather, the issue is in your gullibility and lack of critical thinking skills.
Well then I'm glad the Denmark thread exists to prove that false...
(March 9, 2018 at 9:00 am)Lutrinae Wrote:(March 9, 2018 at 8:48 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Supernatural is a real word with a real definition.
So is bootylicious.
A word I'm sure you know all about...
