Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[LadyForCamus]

So thunder used to be supernatural but is now natural? And also quantum mechanics is supernatural, also dark matter, dark energy, dark flow are still currently supernatural.

This definition implies that anything that you credit as being the workings of your god actually has a natural explanation that we just do not yet understand.

Consequently, we should be able to apply the scientific method and perform experiments on gods, angels, prayer etc.

Further, this also means that we can discard beliefs because they violate the laws of nature that we now understand, such as the second law of thermodynamics meaning that a god cannot be eternal.

So... some guy looked at a photo, and declared the contents "beyond scientific understanding"?

He didn’t even say that much though.  The person who “vetted” the picture simply said the photo hadn’t been tampered with after the fact, and that it is, in fact, a photo of light.  He never mentioned anything about the source of light not being natural, whatever that even means. Then Huggy makes the mind boggling leap from light to Jesus, and his evidence?  ‘Well, the priest said it was god,
and he was a good guy so...’ lol.

I wonder, if we were all instantly convinced, and converted to Christianity based on this picture, might Huggy think to himself that we’re a tad gullible?