RE: Evolution
March 10, 2018 at 3:28 am
(This post was last modified: March 10, 2018 at 3:32 am by Ravenshire.)
(March 10, 2018 at 2:12 am)He lives Wrote:(March 9, 2018 at 11:48 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: (emphasis is mine)
You keep using that word as if it applies to what your lamely attempting to refute.
Why don't you set aside your great-big-book-of-fairy-tales and try some actual science books for a change?
There is actual science and there is science such as what I refer to as happenstance science. Abiogenesis is a terminology where there are many hypotheses and NO clear answers. This type of science can only be described as a belief and not actual science. With so many guesses as to how life began the best you have is a hunch. Your conclusion is entirely based on a guess that is so far fetched it is in the realm of being completely impossible.
You know, coming here with, at best, willful ignorance of the science you desperately want to refute is going to impress and/or convince exactly no one. You know that, right?
It's obvious you don't understand abiogenesis, evolution or even fundamental biology, yet you expect us to accept ID, completely unsupported by any actual evidence, simply on your say-so. Talk about arrogance in the extreme!
(March 10, 2018 at 3:20 am)He lives Wrote:(March 10, 2018 at 2:55 am)JackRussell Wrote: Can you quote some of that latest research and link to the relevant papers without a frantic google search?
I can.
Abiogenesis is a tricky problem, but that life began and that common descent from that point occurred is trivially obvious to those without an agenda to insert their mythology.
ID is the lazy route that obviates meaningful inquiry. To date no intelligence is observed, just stuff doing what it will always do under certain circumstances. Replicating that is an obvious problem, can you work out why?
So many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied for life to be created out of inorganic material and then developed into a human body without intelligent design would be an impossibility. Intelligent design is much more probable. I believe that intelligence has always existed and that our bodies were intellectually designed.
I'm personally incredulous, so magic, isn't a valid argument. Could you perhaps describe the process your gawd used to make man from dirt and woman from spare ribs? Please, don't point at the buy-bull. I've read that shit and the methodology is, not surprisingly, completely absent.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.