RE: Evolution
March 10, 2018 at 5:17 pm
(This post was last modified: March 10, 2018 at 5:26 pm by Banned.)
(March 10, 2018 at 5:03 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Darwin said "change through time". There is no crocoducks, just small changes that accumulate. We've had half a billion years to get to where we are, no need to rush things.
Small changes over time scales that exceed observed history?
(March 10, 2018 at 5:04 pm)chimp3 Wrote:(March 10, 2018 at 4:56 pm)Banned Wrote: Should we assume that the designed object has intelligence?Should we assume anything is "designed" unless it is a computer or car?
To assume that something sophisticated and purposeful is the result of intelligent design, is normal compared to assuming that such was just found in a swamp.
(March 10, 2018 at 5:07 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: To always look for an answer that's a better fit for the known facts. You know, the way science already does. POE.
(March 10, 2018 at 4:58 pm)Banned Wrote: Then why is it only a modern idea?
Because it's only relatively recently that we've had the science to study it properly. POE.
How does it go? "ever seeking the truth but never finding it."
(March 10, 2018 at 5:13 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Banned wrote: Should we expect some evolution ideas to show up in history?
Even if it had not it does not change the process of evolution .
So we aren't really going by evidence any more?
