Evolution

[robvalue]

People expect us to come up with 12 years worth of basic science education, plus further particular theory regarding very complex biological procedures, plus all the relevant evidence, in one forum post.

Of course it's going to seem unlikely to someone who has absolutely no idea about the basics of science, let alone the advanced details of evolution. You can either go do some work and actually learn what it is you are objecting to; or remain ignorant all your life and scream your incredulity until your lungs hurt.

Luckily, neither reality nor science stops working because someone can't understand it. What possible point these guys are trying to make is beyond me. Evolution being wrong does not equal intelligent design being right, for a start. It just means we're back to no explanation. ID isn't even a scientific hypothesis. And who cares if we're designed? What difference does it make?

I do have a further question though. Imagine you're an intelligent designer, and you can make the environment however you want for your creation. How much of it would you make instantly lethal to them?

(a) 0%
(b) 1%
© 10%
(d) Virtually 100%