RE: Evolution
March 11, 2018 at 5:35 am
(This post was last modified: March 11, 2018 at 5:54 am by Little Rik.)
(March 10, 2018 at 11:44 am)chimp3 Wrote:(March 10, 2018 at 11:33 am)Little Rik Wrote:
Ok, then.
Are you ready to show me that she never did something wrong with solid evidence?
Put up or shut up son.
At least once a year I like to remind our fellow forum lurkers the hidden sickness of your twisted thoughts. I can not conceive of any humanist ever finding a reason that rape would be acceptable. You seem to revel in it. I hope you do not have children. If you do or have, please keep this sick idea away from them. If they suffer from sexual abuse they would only feel guilt and shame for bringing rape upon themselves.
Idiot.

1) When I ever said that rape is acceptable?

I am only saying that humans are not able to change the natural laws.
Can you cancel or undo a reaction after an action take place?
These laws are not set by LR you fool.

All humans can do is to limit or avoid the damage if that is possible and of course I will be the first to help if I can.
2) As usual you fail to bring any evidence that this little girl in question never lived before and never engage in bad actions.
I already knew that you are all talking and zero substance.

(March 10, 2018 at 2:12 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(March 10, 2018 at 10:23 am)Little Rik Wrote: I never finish to wonder how stupid can you be yog.
Atheists are there all the time to glorify physical science but physical science say that for every action there got to be and equal and opposite reaction.
You're referring to Newton's first law of motion, which, not surprisingly, applies only to motion of physical bodies. Since it only applies to efficient, material causes, it is definitely not karma. You're making the claim that because physical bodies can be described in this way that moral bodies can be described this way. That's a claim, not an argument. You need to show that Newton's first law of motion applies to moral properties, not simply claim it. Otherwise you're just equivocating upon the meaning of the law. So no, Newton's first law of motion doesn't demonstrate karma; karma is totally unrelated to the laws governing motion of physical bodies.
(March 10, 2018 at 10:23 am)Little Rik Wrote: This is karma in action.
No, it's not. It's a description of efficient, material causes. It has fuckall to do with karma. What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
(March 10, 2018 at 10:23 am)Little Rik Wrote: Karma goes hand in hand with this science that of course contradict atheists 100% and if there is karma obviously there is someone who run this karma.
Bullshit. You can't simply extend laws of motion to imperceptible properties and hope it still holds. Your claim that Newton's laws of motion demonstrate karma is false.
So, you still haven't provided any actual evidence of karma.
(March 10, 2018 at 10:23 am)Little Rik Wrote: Fail once again yog.
Someone once said, "First of all you only present one point among those who I already knock down in the previous post." Likewise, you have utterly failed to demonstrate the existence of reincarnation which was the task that was set before you. So in addition to being wrong about Newton's laws of motion, you've completely failed to address the actual topic. Remember evolution? It's in the title of the thread. You have to demonstrate karma and reincarnation for your views on evolution to be valid.
Put up or shut up. Provide evidence of reincarnation and karma or GTFO. If you're going to invoke god, then you need to demonstrate him as well.
Try again, asswipe. Your last post didn't accomplish shit.
More and more idiotic comments from you but after all what to expect from such an idiot.

Science is all about searching and more searching but it seems that atheists gave up on searching.
In fact they never bother to search so science which is all about searching means absolutely nothing to them.

Take someone who born healthy and wealthy while somebody else born sick and poor.
Atheists don't really bother to know why.
For them is all about good or bad luck.
In this universe there is no such a thing as good or bad luck.
If that would be the case this universe never existed in the first place or if it would have started at one stage because of bad luck it would have already disintegrate but it never did and never will BECAUSE obviously someone run it.
Atheism is based on coincidences that is why searching goes down the sewer while fantasies reign supreme.
