Evolution

[Angrboda]

A pupil will never understand the knowledge-consciousness of a degree person or a person engaged in other scientific studies fruit of years of studies and sacrifices.
Atheism and lack of knowledge go hand in hand because atheism is based on coincidences not on study.
It just puzzle me how atheists have the audacity to say that they are expert in science when in fact that is not the case considering that science contradict atheists on every step.

All atheists do is dismiss every single point from non atheists even without bothering to search whether it may be true or not.
Dismiss, dismiss and more dismiss.
This is the atheist mantra repeated like in a rosary day and night.

Even real experiences such as NDEs are dismissed automatically not because they don't carry any evidence but because they would contradict atheism itself.

Fortunately this is the age of openness and free information where even the most repressive regimes find very difficult to stop the free flow of information.
Anyone who try to carry on with dogmas are on the way out and dumped in the rubbish bin of history.

You can dismiss how much as you like yog  but at the end your dogmas will for sure end up in the rubbish bin of history.  

Oh Jesus fucking Christ, quit your fucking crying like a little spoilt baby.

Mommy she dismissed this!  Mommy she dismissed that!  Wah!  Wah!

Do you know why I dismissed what you presented?  Because it wasn't evidence.  You presented two things: bare ass assertions and unsubstantiated analogies.  If I just bare asserted something like "Consciousness ends at death," then you'd dismiss it too.  Bare assertions aren't evidence so I didn't dismiss anything that wasn't worthy of dismissing.  The other thing you presented was lame analogies which are just assertions in a different form.  You claimed that such and so is like X, to which I pointed out that I can equally arbitrarily say that such and so is NOT like X.  All we have is your claim that it's like X.  That's not evidence.  That's just more assertion.  So despite your crying like a whiny bitch, I didn't dismiss anything that didn't deserve dismissal.  And I gave solid reasons for each dismissal.  Each time I rebuffed one of your bare assertions, you immediately changed the subject to something else.  I'm not responsible for the fact that you gave up each time and switched to something else.  

But I'll be nice.  You present one piece of evidence that you presented that you feel was dismissed unfairly and we'll talk about it.  If you're just going to cry about being butthurt over how badly you fared in this discussion though, you can take your attitude and shove it up your ass sideways.  Present one piece of evidence, and we'll discuss it.  Or don't, and continue acting like a loser and whining about being schooled by someone you feel is inferior to you.