Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic

[I_am_not_mafia]

 I've seen the same person argue, that things don't need a cause to begin to exists.

Who has said that? Me? I've been arguing that the word 'cause' is linguistic shorthand that religionists use for equivocation. It is a useful abstraction so we don't have to describe the all the relevant features of the environment. The KCA only works for people who don't realise this and who seem to think that everything begins to exist because of a single cause and while forgetting about the time between not existing and existing.

For example:

What causes a snowflake to exist?