A second century neo-platonist writer who, c 180 AD, wrote a denunciation of christians. The only reason we know of him is because the 3d century xtian writer, Origen, wrote what he thought was a refutation of Celsus' complaints in a work entitled Contra Celsus ( Against Celsus) and quoted large portions of the original work. When xtian thugs burned the libraries of antiquity they made sure that the works of their writers were preserved which is how we know of Porphyry and Celsus.
So, what does Celsus have to say about xtians? The first three comments:
The bolded part gives him a 1900 year head start on Bart Ehrman.
So, what does Celsus have to say about xtians? The first three comments:
Quote: SCRITURAL REDACTION
"It is clear to me that the writings of the christians are a lie, and that your fables are not well-enough constructed to conceal this monstrous fiction: I have heard that some of your interpreters...are on to the inconsistencies and, pen in hand, alter the originals writings, three, four and several more times over in order to be able to deny the contradictions in the face of criticism."
"There is nothing new or impressive about their ethical teaching; indeed, when one compares it to other philosophies, their simplemindedness becomes apparent."
"One ought first to follow reason as a guide before accepting any belief, since anyone who believes without testing a doctrine is certain to be deceived"
The bolded part gives him a 1900 year head start on Bart Ehrman.
