RE: Big Bang theory is not valid.
September 1, 2011 at 6:10 pm
(This post was last modified: September 1, 2011 at 6:25 pm by Jaysyn.)
(September 1, 2011 at 2:21 pm)LastPoet Wrote:(September 1, 2011 at 2:16 pm)Diamond-Deist Wrote:
If you speak so much about "debate" why don't you argue for your position instead of bitching about the way people mock you? If you have evidence for your case, DO IT NOW!
I wasn't mocking him. I was actually being polite.
(September 1, 2011 at 2:16 pm)Diamond-Deist Wrote: If you can take your tongue out of Chucks as* for a second .......Very mature response.
(September 1, 2011 at 2:16 pm)Diamond-Deist Wrote: WTF did he explain to me exactly that was so enlightening to this conversation?Try actually reading post #114.
(September 1, 2011 at 2:16 pm)Diamond-Deist Wrote: Jaysyn your arrival is a new low in this thread ..... now we have groupies.That wouldn't hurt my feelings a bit, we have enough trolls here already & I'm sure another will show up tomorrow to take your place.
Put your heels and panties back on and if all your going to contribute is to back up your "man" then don't bother.
If you guy's are so pathetic that you are incapable of having a debate (because having a discussion takes opinions from two sides) then sure I will leave this forum if that's what you want?
(September 1, 2011 at 2:16 pm)Diamond-Deist Wrote: If you find me questioning the BB makes you insecure then that's fine.Yes, I'm very insecure about some random Internet non-astronomer with a laughable grasp on science questioning years & years of study & data that have gone into forming the Big Bang theory. You figured me out.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
