Evolution

[Abaddon_ire]

Still cannot comprehend that atheism has no dogmas by definition, eh?

Wrong again brother Aba.  
Atheism is a dogma BECAUSE the concept of a NO God is build on a guess not on solid evidence so when you come to the conclusion on a guess you fall in the corral of dogma.

Wrong. Atheism is not built on a guess. It rests on the lack of any evidence for any of the countless thousands of claimed deities that never show up anywhere ever. Or do anything. Or even speak.

Atheists too are floating in a sea of dogmas.

Everyone is floating in a sea of dogmas. You even have a peculiar dogma of your own. Let's consider that one. Absent any jot or tittle of evidence, why should anyone accept your dogma?

From.......the consciousness is a product of the brain to.......when we die is all over to......the universe can do without God because entropy can do the job.
Just to mention few of them.

Provide an example of a consciousness that exists without a brain.
Provide an example of survival after death.
Provide an example which requires the intervention of any god.

You cannot.

Total confusion VL.  
Consciousness and soul are the same thing whichever way you turn it.
But again NDEs already proved that as the body die the consciousness-soul get disconnected from the dead body.  

No they don't. By definition NDE's are "Near Death" not actually dead at all.

Wrong again Aba.  

The word of a doctor is a lot lot more important than the definition given.
As far as a doctor say that a person is dead then it means that such a person is really dead and when a doctor see the same person alive after sometime that means that he-she is really alive.

NDE claimers haven't been declared dead for the most part, and I have my own experience on the operating table as reference. NDE claimers are spouting nonsense.

It is absurd that something material such as the brain can give birth to something abstract and so much great as the consciousness.
It would be like if the vehicle can give birth to the driver.
The materialistic idea is so absurd that is laughable so only an idiot would believe along those lines.  

Emergent behaviour. Learn what that is. To give you a simple example, explain why Langton's Ant always builds a highway regardless of the starting conditions.

Man.
Cut all this intellectual crap please.  

Heaven forfend that one might actually think, right?

In nature the matter is totally unable to jump up all of a sudden in her progress and give birth to something endlessly more subtle such as a human consciousness that is why the brain that is made of matter and therefore of a very limited form of consciousness can not create the human consciousness.  

Billions of years is hardly "all of a sudden", is it?

Considering is a question.
Believing in it is a different question which imply to give away a lifetime of dogmas.
Something to difficult to conceive for stubborn people.  

I was raised Catholic. I gave that dogma up around the same time as Santa. You, apparently, cling to the safety blanket of childhood. Why?

Why are your dogmas sacrosanct?

What dogma?

You show a dogma that I suppose to have and I will cover you in pure gold.  

Souls exist. Where's my gold?

There is nothing wrong in considering alternative points but when you see that the alternative is absurd then if you got a little bit of brain you know you should discard that alternative ASAP.  

That's how one becomes an atheist, discarding absurd beliefs.

But you think that you are right no matter what. That is a dogma that you hold.

Wrong. I will gladly change my mind on any matter when presented with evidence. Baseless assertions don't move me at all.

That would be a dogma if I would think that also in the future I will always be right.
The future however is unknown to me that is why I only stick with what I know so far and so far in the field of God or not God I am right.  

Wrong. You claim to know that you will be reincarnated.

Gee, you always give me bad news brother Khem.  
Hallucinations however are not real so your predictions will never come true.  

Reincarnation isn't true, so you are stuck.

Wrong once again.
Reincarnation is true because NDEs are true.

See above. It is all a load of bollocks.

One question for you brother Khem.  
Suppose you are God and you have to sort out who goes up in the human evolution and who goes down.  
What would you do with those engaged in blasphemy?  

That is not how evolution works in any way shape or form. Suppose you were a leprechaun. How do you decide who gets your crock of shit gold?

Don't know. What are you going to do about your blasphemy?

One accusation must be follow by solid evidence.
Considering that you lack in evidence you show how wrong you are.
Once again of course.  

Why do you never follow with solid evidence?