Evolution

[Little Rik]

Wrong again brother Aba.  
Atheism is a dogma BECAUSE the concept of a NO God is build on a guess not on solid evidence so when you come to the conclusion on a guess you fall in the corral of dogma.

Wrong. Atheism is not built on a guess. It rests on the lack of any evidence for any of the countless thousands of claimed deities that never show up anywhere ever. Or do anything. Or even speak.

This is the answer that a fool gave when he was asked why he didn't find anything in the treasure hunt.  

Atheists too are floating in a sea of dogmas.

Everyone is floating in a sea of dogmas. You even have a peculiar dogma of your own. Let's consider that one. Absent any jot or tittle of evidence, why should anyone accept your dogma?

Evidence is everywhere but again the FOOL always look in the wrong place and obviously he never find it.  
The idiot look outside while the evidence is within.  

From.......the consciousness is a product of the brain to.......when we die is all over to......the universe can do without God because entropy can do the job.
Just to mention few of them.

Provide an example of a consciousness that exists without a brain.
Provide an example of survival after death.
Provide an example which requires the intervention of any god.
You cannot.

Yes I can.
NDEs, NDEs and looking deep within in the subconscious mind.    

Wrong again Aba.  

The word of a doctor is a lot lot more important than the definition given.
As far as a doctor say that a person is dead then it means that such a person is really dead and when a doctor see the same person alive after sometime that means that he-she is really alive.

NDE claimers haven't been declared dead for the most part, and I have my own experience on the operating table as reference. NDE claimers are spouting nonsense.

I got bad news for you son.  
Even strong and staunch atheists change their mind after their NDE.
And what about Eben Alexander an expert in brain?
Who are you Aba?
Are you such a FOOL that pretend to know more than the experts and think that ex atheists (now strong theists) are lying?  

Man.
Cut all this intellectual crap please.  

Heaven forfend that one might actually think, right?

I really wish you would think right but unfortunately you do not.

In nature the matter is totally unable to jump up all of a sudden in her progress and give birth to something endlessly more subtle such as a human consciousness that is why the brain that is made of matter and therefore of a very limited form of consciousness can not create the human consciousness.  

Billions of years is hardly "all of a sudden", is it?

True.
It takes billions of years for the matter to turn into human consciousness that is why the brain that is made of matter can not possibly turn into human consciousness.

Considering is a question.
Believing in it is a different question which imply to give away a lifetime of dogmas.
Something to difficult to conceive for stubborn people.  

I was raised Catholic. I gave that dogma up around the same time as Santa. You, apparently, cling to the safety blanket of childhood. Why?

Actually I also was raised Catholic and I also gave up that dogma.
Luckily I found Mr. anti dogma in person who show me how to keep away from dogmas.

Why are your dogmas sacrosanct?

What dogma?

You got the wrong quotation son.

Go back and see who wrote that.  

You show a dogma that I suppose to have and I will cover you in pure gold.

Souls exist. Where's my gold?

You are running too much with your fantasy Mr.
Explain first in what context you say that.

There is nothing wrong in considering alternative points but when you see that the alternative is absurd then if you got a little bit of brain you know you should discard that alternative ASAP.  

That's how one becomes an atheist, discarding absurd beliefs.

Of course absurd beliefs must be discarded provided that they are void of any evidence.
However to jump on the wagon of atheism which is also build on a guess is equal foolish.

But you think that you are right no matter what. That is a dogma that you hold.

Wrong. I will gladly change my mind on any matter when presented with evidence. Baseless assertions don't move me at all.

Once again you got the wrong quotation.
Somebody else said that.

That would be a dogma if I would think that also in the future I will always be right.
The future however is unknown to me that is why I only stick with what I know so far and so far in the field of God or not God I am right.  

Wrong. You claim to know that you will be reincarnated.

You are out of context.
My previous answer is related to whether I will or will not be correct in my judgements in the next life if of course I will be reincarnated again.
Reincarnation so far has been proved in thousand of NDEs so is not a dogma beside if my karma is wiped out I don't have to be reincarnated again.

Wrong once again.
Reincarnation is true because NDEs are true.

See above. It is all a load of bollocks.

See above.
The evidence is overwhelming.

One question for you brother Khem.  
Suppose you are God and you have to sort out who goes up in the human evolution and who goes down.  
What would you do with those engaged in blasphemy?

That is not how evolution works in any way shape or form. Suppose you were a leprechaun. How do you decide who gets your crock of shit gold?

That is how evolution works Aba.
Your free will will get you up or down in the evolution process.

One accusation must be follow by solid evidence.
Considering that you lack in evidence you show how wrong you are.
Once again of course.  

Why do you never follow with solid evidence?

Don't panic mate.
You too will find solid evidence the day you will stop looking outside and star looking within.  





(Color mine)